#Child aviation restraint system rental install#

2ģ Drivers Request for approval of Belly Belt Operational problems associated with CRS Search for innovative solution Child Safety System - not necessarily a seat 3Ĥ RFP Project Initiation Results - No CRS manufacturers Successful bidder - AASTRA Aerospace Engineering - since evolved into a telecommunications company 4ĥ Design Decisions Who provides? What standard to use? Modal vs Multi-modal Aviation Standards or Automotive Standards - for materials & machining Certification - Self certified or approved? 5Ħ Standard CMVSS 213 used in absence of aviation specific standard CMVSS 213 similar to FMVSS 213 except for more conservative head excursion limit of 28.4 inches (720 mm) vs 32 inches (813 mm) - generates a requirement for a top tether Additional requirements for aviation environment 6Ĩ Current Performance Criteria per FMVSS-213 8ġ7 AVIATION VS AUTOMOTIVE WIDTH BETWEEN ARMRESTS BASE - DIMENSIONS SEAT PITCH INSTALLATION METHODS INSTALLATION FREQUENCY ANCHORAGE POINTS 17ġ8 Additional Requirements Simple and obvious to install in a/c Easy and quick to adjust Compact - minimize stowage space Easy to maintain Compatible with aircraft seats Effective in aviation environment Must provide occupant protection 18ġ9 PROJECT EVOLUTION MODULAR FLOTATION CONCEPT NON-FLOATING, FOLDING SYSTEM, (MARK I PROTOTYPE) OPTIMIZED FOLDING SYSTEM (MARK II PROTOTYPE, ACSS) MARK II A 19ģ0 DYNAMIC TESTS CHILD TEST RESULTS (CMVSS 213) CRITERION MAXIMUM ACSS TEST PERMISSIBLE VALUE MAX. Objective was to determine the feasibility of developing a CRS which meets the needs of the users, the airline industry, and the regulators. 1 Child Restraint Research Transport Canada Transportation Development Centre Aastra Aerospace 1Ģ Project Evolution Joint FAA/TC testing in 1989 Recommendation: R & D dedicated to the design of a restraint system for infants and small children traveling in aircraft be conducted without delay.

Child aviation restraint system rental